Police Stop and frisk Essay

Is vernal York Citys Stop and Frisk law infringing upon Americans rights?In 2011, 685, 724 people were break in and frisked by the police. This is a record exalted by more than 50,000 pessarys in sassy York City, 87% of the stops were either black or Latino, raising the question of is this morally estimable due to racial profiling (NYCLU, 2014). Why should an individual be stopped and frisked without probable cause? stopping and frisking without probable cause is an act of racism, profiling slightlyone due to their skin color is wrong, unethical, and creates an prospect that only, or mostly oral presentation people of color atomic number 18 our criminals of society. Black and Latino atomic number 18 non the sole criminals commiting just as many violent acts or same severity of crimes more than another(prenominal) people of society, so why should people of color be a higher concern than some not of color? If the laws of New York City say that any individual can be stopped and frisked, each person should be searched equally, instead of predominantly people of color. After all, every person of every race commits the same crime, and must be seen as an equal threat to society.For example, in The East stead of New York, police are heavily profiling. 50% of the population consists of blacks, and 39% percent being Hispanic. still 8% of the re looknts over the age of 25 have a college degree (NYC, 2014). This has been a notorious region for police rack upicers to stop and frisk. This is a prime example of a poor locality being use to police abusing their power to stop and frisk being based upon the socio economic status of this specific neighborhood consisting of 89% colored individuals. Today is the beginning of a long-overdue process the correct of the NYPD to end illegal and racially discriminatory policing, express Vincent Warren, executive director of the nerve centre for Constitutional Rights (Fox News, 2014). Vincent Warren is The Executive Director of The Center of Constitutional Rights, also known as the CCR.This legal organization is in sole purpose in the effort to defend the rights of The join States constitution to defend the decloration of human rights (CCR, 2014). Vince oversees CCRs groundbreaking litigation and advocacy work which includes using international and domestic law to hold corporations and government officialsaccountable for human rights abuses gainsay racial, gender and LGBT injustice(CCR, 2014). It is in-chief(postnominal) to note that organizations that are being supported by people such(prenominal) as Vincent Warren are going to high extremes to ensure the constitutional rights of every person, specifically speaking the counter argument of the stop and frisk laws are an injustice in not in New York City, but in every area of The United States.For too long, communities of color have felt on a lower floor siege by the police, and young Black and Latino men have disproportionately been the ta rget, he said in a news release. We are eager to finally begin creating real change(Fox News, 2014). It is important to note people with high political power such as Vincent Warren are advocating of change of the stop and frisk laws, making this topic of the morals behind the stop and frisk laws are wrong, and reform is necessary to protect The Constitutional rights of the people of America. The entire point of The Constituion is to protect The People. The main close of the colonization of the Americas is to make life for the people, protecting the rights of every person, not to take away freedom or rights.There must be reform in order to ensure people are by-line the princples and morals being based upon in which The United States of America is formed. Not only are high ranking officials protecting the rights of people such as Vincent Warren, but the judges and prosectuors themselves who are prosecuting the people who are being arrested under the stop and frisk laws are in fact s upporting the change of these laws. This is passing lively to aknowledge due to the fact that the people who are being involved in the actual penalty of criminals are defending the rights of people, and specifically people of color as in the notorious East side of New York City. For example, A judge ruled last year that the New York Police Department had discriminated against blacks and Hispanics when stopping, teasing and sometimes frisking people on the street.The judge ordered major reforms to the departments instruction execution of the policy (Fox News, 2014). With the support of the CCR (Center for Constitutional Rights) along with the encouragement of the Judges to amend the laws of stop and frisk is vital to the response that the stop and frisk laws must be taken more seriously to ensure that the princples upon which The United States of America is founded upon are being followed. I strongly believe the stop andfrisk laws are a complete infringement upon any single indi viduals constitutional rights. Politicians argue that the stop and frisk laws have been eliminating crimes off of the streets at a significant rate, but this does not excuse police force to profile and exit the judicial system to prosecute people who are being searched without probably cause. Probably cause clear states, sufficient reason based upon known facts to believe a crime has been committed or that legitimate property is connected with a crime.Probable cause must exist for a law enforcement police officer to make an arrest without a warrant, search without a warrant, or seize property in the legal opinion the items were express of a crime(Hill, 2014). Why should the laws obtaining to probable cause even exist if the law of stop and frisk is demonstrating the hypocritical aspect of probable cause? Probable cause completely cancels out when stop and frisk laws allow police officers to randomly search somebody when there is no clear evidence or reason for someone to be se arched. The laws of stop and frisk must continue to reform, constitutional rights are very important to protect. As being stated by politicians and people working under the justice System, the stop and frisk laws are wrong, and must be thrown out.BibliographyStop and Frisk Statistics in New York City Neighborhoods Google Search. Stop and Frisk Statistics in New York City Neighborhoods Google Search. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2014. .Stop-and-Frisk Data New York accomplished Liberties Union (NYCLU) American Civil Liberties Union of New York State. Stop-and-Frisk Data New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) American Civil Liberties Union of New York State. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2014. http//www.nyclu.org/content/stop-and-frisk-data/.Light, Michelle. East New York, Brooklyn. N.p., n.d. Web. .Lawyers NYC Agrees to Reforms in Stop-and-frisk. Fox News. throw away News Network, 30 Jan. 2014. Web. 16 Apr. 2014. .